๐ถ๏ธGas Saving Technique 39: Avoiding Duplicated Code for Gas Savings
Introduction: Duplicated code, also known as code redundancy, not only affects the readability and maintainability of smart contracts but also has a direct impact on deployment and execution costs. Each repeated line of code contributes to the overall size of a contract, leading to increased gas costs. This tutorial highlights the importance of avoiding duplicated code for gas efficiency.
Concept:
Duplicated Code: Refers to identical or very similar blocks of code that appear in multiple locations in a contract.
Gas Efficiency: The measure of how effectively a contract utilizes the gas required for deployment and transaction execution. Duplicated code negatively impacts gas efficiency by increasing the overall bytecode size.
Reasons to Avoid Duplicated Code:
Increased Deployment Costs: The larger the contract's bytecode, the more gas required to deploy it on the Ethereum network.
Higher Transaction Costs: Repeated operations can lead to higher execution costs for transactions.
Maintenance Challenges: Duplicated code can introduce bugs and make it harder to update or modify the contract in the future.
Readability: Redundant code makes it harder for developers to understand the contract's logic, potentially leading to errors or overlooked vulnerabilities.
Techniques to Reduce Duplicated Code:
Modularization:
Break your contract into smaller, reusable components or functions.
For example, if multiple functions use the same logic for checking user permissions, move that logic into a separate internal function.
Use Libraries:
Externalize common logic into libraries. This allows you to reuse code across different contracts.
Example:
SafeMath
library in Solidity for arithmetic operations.
Inheritance and Interfaces:
Use inheritance to create base contracts with shared logic that can be inherited by other contracts.
Define interfaces for contracts that can implement common functionality.
State Variable Initialization:
If multiple functions initialize the same state variables with default values, consider setting these defaults during contract deployment to avoid redundancy.
Conclusion: Avoiding duplicated code is essential for writing gas-efficient, readable, and maintainable smart contracts. Regularly reviewing and refactoring contracts to minimize redundancy can save developers both gas and potential headaches in the long run.
Last updated