Gas Saving Technique 6: NOT operator ! cheaper than boolean FALSE
Last updated
Last updated
In the pursuit of optimizing smart contracts for lower gas consumption, every small improvement counts. One such micro-optimization involves using !true
(logical NOT) instead of == false
for boolean comparisons. This seemingly trivial change can lead to minor gas savings, contributing to the overall efficiency of your smart contract operations on the Ethereum network.
Understanding Gas Consumption
Cost Differences in Comparisons: Using == false
for comparison slightly consumes more gas than the !true
approach. The == false
comparison has an additional operation of checking equality, leading to a marginally higher gas cost.
Gas Savings with !true
Efficiency of Logical NOT: Utilizing !true
is more gas-efficient as it directly negates the boolean value without the need for an equality check, offering a cleaner and more gas-conservative operation.
!true
for Gas SavingsPractical Example: Efficient Boolean Comparison
Letโs understand this with a practical example:
Before Optimization:
After Optimization:
In the optimized version, !flag
is used instead of flag == false
. This makes the code not only more readable but also slightly more gas-efficient.
Identify Boolean Comparisons: Review your smart contracts to locate boolean comparisons using == false
.
Use Logical NOT: Replace == false
comparisons with !true
to achieve minor gas savings per operation.
Test: Implement thorough testing to ensure that the change maintains the expected contract behavior while saving gas.
While the gas savings from using !true
instead of == false
might appear minimal for a single transaction, it's important to consider the cumulative effect over thousands or millions of transactions. Such minor optimizations collectively lead to more gas-efficient smart contracts, ultimately resulting in lower costs for users and better resource utilization on the Ethereum network. Always ensure to test the smart contract extensively after making these micro-optimizations to validate that the functionality remains intact.
Reference