⚖️Gas Saving Technique 6: NOT operator ! cheaper than boolean FALSE
Introduction
In the pursuit of optimizing smart contracts for lower gas consumption, every small improvement counts. One such micro-optimization involves using !true (logical NOT) instead of == false for boolean comparisons. This seemingly trivial change can lead to minor gas savings, contributing to the overall efficiency of your smart contract operations on the Ethereum network.
Impact & Details
Understanding Gas Consumption
Cost Differences in Comparisons: Using
== falsefor comparison slightly consumes more gas than the!trueapproach. The== falsecomparison has an additional operation of checking equality, leading to a marginally higher gas cost.
Gas Savings with !true
Efficiency of Logical NOT: Utilizing
!trueis more gas-efficient as it directly negates the boolean value without the need for an equality check, offering a cleaner and more gas-conservative operation.
How to Implement !true for Gas Savings
!true for Gas SavingsPractical Example: Efficient Boolean Comparison
Let’s understand this with a practical example:
Before Optimization:
solidityCopy code// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
contract BooleanOptimizer {
bool public flag = true;
function checkFlag() public view returns (bool) {
if (flag == false) { // Using == false for comparison
return false;
}
return true;
}
}After Optimization:
solidityCopy code// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
pragma solidity ^0.8.0;
contract BooleanOptimizer {
bool public flag = true;
function checkFlag() public view returns (bool) {
if (!flag) { // Using !true (logical NOT) for comparison
return false;
}
return true;
}
}In the optimized version, !flag is used instead of flag == false. This makes the code not only more readable but also slightly more gas-efficient.
Recommended Mitigation Steps
Identify Boolean Comparisons: Review your smart contracts to locate boolean comparisons using
== false.Use Logical NOT: Replace
== falsecomparisons with!trueto achieve minor gas savings per operation.Test: Implement thorough testing to ensure that the change maintains the expected contract behavior while saving gas.
Conclusion
While the gas savings from using !true instead of == false might appear minimal for a single transaction, it's important to consider the cumulative effect over thousands or millions of transactions. Such minor optimizations collectively lead to more gas-efficient smart contracts, ultimately resulting in lower costs for users and better resource utilization on the Ethereum network. Always ensure to test the smart contract extensively after making these micro-optimizations to validate that the functionality remains intact.
Reference
Last updated